Looking for an honest comparison between Appycan and Applyall? This review breaks down how both job application tools work, their pricing, and which one offers more value for high-volume job seekers who want to maximize their time and budget.
How Appycan and Applyall Work: Self-Serve vs Managed Service
Appycan and Applyall both help job seekers apply to large numbers of jobs, but their approaches are fundamentally different. Understanding the core model for each will help you decide what fits your workflow best.
Appycan: Chrome Extension for Job Seekers Who Want Control
Appycan is a Chrome extension that you install directly in your browser. It automates applying to LinkedIn jobs while you go about your day. You set your own filters: roles, salary, location, company blocklist. Appycan fills out applications on your behalf using your saved answers, including AI-written cover letters on higher plans. You stay in control of your LinkedIn profile and can pause or adjust your campaign at any time.
Applyall: Managed Service for Set-and-Forget Applications
Applyall works as a managed-service model. Instead of a browser extension, you provide your resume and preferences to their team. They apply to jobs on your behalf, including roles on LinkedIn, Indeed, and other platforms. You have limited control over the exact jobs or answers submitted. Most communication and management happens through their website or email, not directly through your own job platform accounts.
Price Per Application: Which Tool Gives Better Value?
Pricing is often the deciding factor for job seekers applying to dozens or hundreds of positions. Both Appycan and Applyall offer subscription plans, but their pricing structures and cost per application are very different.
Appycan Pricing Breakdown
- Standard: $8.99 per week for 100 applications per month (about $0.36 per application)
- Premium: $13.84 per week for 200 applications per month (about $0.30 per application, includes AI cover letters, 3-day trial)
- Ultimate: $29.99 per week for 500 applications per month (about $0.24 per application, 3-day trial)
Appycan's cost per application drops as you move up to higher plans. All plans are pay-as-you-go and can be canceled anytime. You get a free trial on Premium and Ultimate, so you can test the workflow before committing.
Applyall Pricing Breakdown
Applyall's pricing is less transparent and can change based on your preferences. Their most common plans start at around $30 to $40 per week for up to 100 applications, though some plans are monthly. This puts the average cost per application at $0.30 to $0.40, sometimes higher if you want more customization or extra services like resume rewrite or tracking.
Application Quality and Personalization: How Much Does Each Tool Care?
Many job seekers worry that automation means sending out low-quality, spammy applications. Both Appycan and Applyall try to avoid this, but their approaches differ.
Appycan: Customizable, AI-Enhanced Applications
Appycan lets you answer common application questions once, then saves and reuses your answers. On Premium and Ultimate, it generates AI-written cover letters and longer form responses tailored to each application. You can review and update your answers anytime. This lets you keep quality high, avoid obvious mistakes, and maintain some level of customization.
Applyall: Outsourced, Generalized Applications
Applyall has a team or automation system that submits applications based on your resume and preferences. You don't have direct oversight of each application sent out. Some users report generic responses or mismatched roles if preferences are not set tightly. Personalization is limited unless you pay more for custom tweaks.
Supported Platforms: Where Do Your Applications Go?
Where your applications are submitted matters. If you focus on LinkedIn, some tools fit better than others. If you want to cast a wider net, managed services may offer more breadth.
Appycan: Focused on LinkedIn Applications
Appycan is designed specifically for LinkedIn. It auto-applies to jobs using the Easy Apply system, which is the fastest way to get in front of recruiters on that platform. Appycan does not support Indeed, ZipRecruiter, or other job boards. For LinkedIn-focused job seekers, this specialization brings better speed and reliability.
Applyall: Multi-Platform Reach
Applyall can submit applications across LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter, and more, depending on your preferences and plan. This gives you a broader reach, but also means less platform-specific optimization. If your targets are spread across multiple job boards, Applyall covers more ground, but with less control over each submission.
User Experience: Control, Transparency, and Setup
The experience of using each tool can make or break your job search routine. Some users want to set their filters and check progress themselves. Others prefer to hand off the work entirely.
Appycan: Transparent, Self-Serve Workflow
With Appycan, you install the extension and set your preferences. You see which jobs are being applied to, can pause or edit your campaign, and review the answers being submitted. The process is transparent and easy to adjust. If you want to stop, you can cancel from settings instantly.
Applyall: Outsourced, Less Granular Control
Using Applyall, you fill out an intake form and upload your resume. After that, most of the process is managed by their team. You may not know exactly which jobs are being applied to in real time. Communication is usually through email or their dashboard, but with less granularity and fewer options to tweak your campaign.
How Appycan Handles Bulk LinkedIn Applications
Appycan is designed for job seekers who want to maximize their applications on LinkedIn without spending hours each week. The extension fills out applications automatically, reuses your answers, and can generate AI cover letters on Premium and Ultimate plans. It pauses when you hit LinkedIn's daily limit, then resumes the next day. You set your own filters and can cancel anytime. For high-volume applicants focused on LinkedIn, Appycan offers a straightforward, lower-cost solution with more transparency than managed services.